Definition: The cities of Aroer [are] forsaken: they shall be for flocks, which shall lie down, and none shall make [them] afraid.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Isaiah 17:2. It's a pretty poetic and symbolic message about the future. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a situation where a city called Aroer – which is mentioned as being near a significant place – will become deserted and unproductive. It’s not a literal ending, but rather a prediction of something happening in the future. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “The cities of Aroer are forsaken…” This means the city of Aroer is going to be abandoned or left behind. It’s being removed from its place. “…they shall be for flocks, which shall lie down…” This describes what happens to the city after it's abandoned. It's going to become a haven for livestock – flocks of sheep, goats, and cattle. “Lie down” suggests they will be in a state of rest and inactivity. “And none shall make [them] afraid.” This is the most important part. It’s saying that no one will be worried or troubled about this abandoned city. It’s creating a peaceful and secure environment for the animals. The Overall Meaning - A Warning & Hope This verse has several layers of meaning, but it’s generally interpreted as a warning to believers about the coming times. It suggests: A Time of Change: The verse speaks of a period of decline or hardship that will inevitably come. Rest and Peace: It promises a time of quietness, safety, and tranquility for the animals – symbolizing a time of rest and peace for humanity after a difficult period. Hope for the Future: It also offers hope because it suggests this peaceful state is temporary. The future holds challenges, but it’s a good thing that this situation will eventually be resolved. In short, Isaiah 17:2 warns of a time of abandonment and peace, offering a promise of rest and tranquility for the animals while emphasizing the possibility of a better future. Do you want me to: Explain any of these concepts further? Give an example of how this verse might be interpreted in a specific historical context (without going into detail)?